We derive a joint continuous/censored commodity demand system for panel data applications. Unobserved heterogeneity is controlled for using a correlated random effects specification and a generalized method of moments framework used to estimate the model. While relatively small differences in elasticity estimates are found between a flexible random effects specification and one that restricts the random effect coefficient to be time invariant, larger differences are observed when comparing the flexible model to a pooled cross‐sectional estimator. The results suggest the limited ability of such estimators to control for preference heterogeneity and unit‐value endogeneity leads to parameter bias.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meyerhoefer et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: