A broad computational analysis of carbon-centered radical formation via the loss of either CO 2 or SO 2 from the respective RXO 2 radical precursors (X = C or S) reveals dramatic differences between these two types of dissociative processes. Whereas the C–C scission with the loss of CO 2 is usually exothermic, the C–S scission with the loss of SO 2 is generally endothermic. However, two factors can make the C–S scissions thermodynamically favorable: increased entropy, characteristic for the dissociative processes, and stereoelectronic influences of substituents. The threshold between endergonic and exergonic C–S fragmentations depends on subtle structural effects. In particular, the degree of fluorination in a radical precursor has a notable impact on the reaction outcome. This study aims to demystify the intricacies in reactivity regarding the generation of radicals from sulfinates and carboxylates, as related to their role in radical cross-coupling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gomes et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: