Why the study?
Routine invasive coronary angiography frequently reveals non-obstructive coronary artery disease, and existing guidelines for non-invasive diagnostic algorithms contain contradictions regarding pretest probability and testing strategies.
Does non-invasive anatomical testing improve the accurate diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease compared to functional tests or routine invasive angiography in patients with suspected stable CAD?
Does non-invasive anatomical testing improve the accurate diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease compared to functional tests or routine invasive angiography in patients with suspected stable CAD?
This review highlights the limitations of current diagnostic algorithms for stable CAD and advocates for the use of non-invasive anatomical imaging like MSCT to reduce unnecessary invasive angiographies.
High normal CAG rates (~38%) signal potential overuse of invasive testing; leaves open optimal noninvasive selection strategies.
High mortality from cardiovascular diseases, especially coronary artery disease (CAD), represents a major economic burden on healthcare systems. The number of diagnostic coronary angiographies (CAG) is increasing in the Russian Federation. However, routine invasive CAG is not able to determine obstructive coronary artery disease in a considerable number of patients. The rate of intact coronary arteries reaches 42% in the major registries and accounts for 37.9% in our Research Institute. Despite all improvements in the diagnostic algorithms focused on suspected coronary artery disease, stated in the recent international and national guidelines, and the availability of advanced non-invasive diagnostic methods, they do not improve accurate CAG diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease. Moreover, the available guidelines contain many contradictions. Therefore, an optimal diagnostic algorithm of significant coronary artery lesions is a subject of discussion. The proposed review discusses all discrepancies concerning the assessment of the pretest probability as well as the proposed non-invasive testing. In addition, the preferred use of non-invasive tests with anatomical assessment (i.e. multispiral computed tomography coronary imaging) rather than functional tests with visualization is stated. This review ensures better understanding of diagnostic strategies for stable coronary artery disease used both in researches and in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Корок et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: