Why the study?
Does anatomical M-mode echocardiography improve the assessment of left ventricular size and function compared to conventional M-mode in horses?
Does anatomical M-mode echocardiography improve the assessment of left ventricular size and function compared to conventional M-mode in horses?
Anatomical M-mode echocardiography is a reliable alternative to conventional M-mode for assessing left ventricular dimensions in horses, but is not recommended for measuring time intervals.
AMM offers a feasible alternative for LV assessment in horses; leaves open clinical utility and need for prospective validation.
OBJECTIVE: To study the applicability of anatomical M-mode (AMM) for assessment of left ventricular (LV) size and function in horses, evaluate agreement with conventional M-mode (CMM), determine reliability, and establish reference intervals for AMM measurements. ANIMALS: 98 horses; 13.1 +/- 5.6 years; 538 +/- 78 kg. METHODS: Two-dimensional and M-mode recordings were analyzed retrospectively. Standard LV dimensions and indices of LV function, including time intervals, were measured in CMM and compared with AMM studies in long-axis (lx) and short-axis (sx) views. RESULTS: The percentages of measureable cycles were 99%, 97%, and 90% for routine LV studies in CMM(sx), AMM(sx), and AMM(lx) mode. For time intervals, >or= 93% of cycles could be measured using AMM compared to a maximum of 77% using CMM. AMM(sx) measurements agreed well with CMM(sx) measurements for LV studies; the agreement of AMM(lx) with CMM(sx) was markedly lower. The LV ejection time and the duration of electromechanical systole, but not the LV pre-ejection period and the index of myocardial performance, showed fair agreement between methods. Intraobserver and interobserver measurement variabilities were low for most variables. CONCLUSIONS: AMM can replace CMM for assessment of LV dimensions in horses, but is not recommended for measurement of time intervals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grenacher et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: