Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate the contractile function of left ventricular muscles in subjects with normal coronary arteries and normal variations of coronary dominance.
Does left ventricular contractile function (strain) vary depending on normal variations of coronary dominance in subjects with normal coronary arteries?
Does left ventricular contractile function (strain) vary depending on normal variations of coronary dominance in subjects with normal coronary arteries?
Normal variations in coronary dominance are associated with differences in left ventricular longitudinal and circumferential strains, suggesting baseline contractile function varies by coronary anatomy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
LV longitudinal/circumferential strains differ by coronary dominance in normals; hypothesis-generating for echo norms and prospective outcome studies.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the contractile function of the left ventricular muscles in subjects with normal coronary artery and normal variations of coronary dominance. METHODS: This study was performed on 90 adult subjects with normal results of coronary arteries angiography, echocardiography, and electrocardiography. The participants were categorized into 3 groups of 30 with right-dominant, left-dominant, and codominant variations. Two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography was performed with apical 2-, 3-, and 4-chamber views and parasternal basal, mid, and apical short-axis views. Then, images were analyzed offline using the velocity vector imaging method. In all studied groups, the mean and standard deviation of left ventricle coronary territorial longitudinal, circumferential, radial strains, and left ventricle global strains were determined. They were compared in 3 layers of sub-endocardial, myocardium, and sub-epicardial. RESULTS: In terms of longitudinal and circumferential strains, there were significant differences in the most coronary territories and global strain among the right-dominant, left-dominant and codominant groups (P < .05). No significant differences in terms of territorial and global radial strains were observed among the study groups (P > .05). CONCLUSION: Strain level decreased from endocardium to epicardium in all studied groups. Territorial and global contractile functions (longitudinal and circumferential strains) of the left ventricle vary depending on the variations of coronary arteries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aghajankhah et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: