Key result
Force plate center-of-pressure speeds correlate moderately with balance scores during sub-acute stroke recovery.
Why the study?
Do force plate measures of quiet standing balance have concurrent validity and discriminative ability in patients during the sub-acute stage of stroke recovery?
Cross-Sectional
Do force plate measures of quiet standing balance have concurrent validity and discriminative ability in patients during the sub-acute stage of stroke recovery?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Speeds of centre of pressure have moderate concurrent validity to quantify balance during sub-acute stroke recovery, and weight-bearing asymmetry can partially discriminate those with a history of falls.
BACKGROUND: Many objective measures of balance control, including force plate measures of standing balance, lack sufficient validation for use in the stroke population. RESEARCH QUESTIONS: Do force plate measures of quiet standing balance during the sub-acute stage of stroke recovery have concurrent validity (i.e., correlate with functional balance measures) and discriminative ability (i.e., differentiate fallers from non-fallers and/or those with low-moderate versus high risk of falling)? METHODS: Participants completed one trial of quiet standing with eyes open, lasting for 30 seconds. History of falls was identified retrospectively, based on falls during the acute-care stay. Risk of falling was determined at admission to inpatient rehabilitation using the STRATIFY scale. Mean speeds of centre of pressure along the anterior-posterior and medial-lateral axes, weight-bearing asymmetry, and symmetry index were calculated. Concurrent validity of these measures were quantified against the Berg Balance Scale; their abilities in differentiating fallers from non-fallers, and individuals with low-moderate versus high risk of falling were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC). RESULTS: Among the measures studied, mean speeds of centre of pressure along the anterior-posterior and medial-lateral axes demonstrated moderate concurrent validity (ρ=-0.490, and -0.440, respectively; p-values≤0.002), while the other two measures did not show sufficient concurrent validity. Weight-bearing asymmetry showed some ability in differentiating fallers from non-fallers (AUC=0.67); however, other measures demonstrated negligible to no discriminative ability. SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings suggest that speeds of centre of pressure have moderate concurrent validity to quantify balance during the sub-acute stage of stroke; they can be used to better inform rehabilitation practice about the balance ability following a stroke. Weight-bearing asymmetry has some ability to discriminate people with and without a history of falls; however, research is required to identify its ability to discriminate future fallers and non-fallers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aryan et al. (2024) conducted a cross-sectional in Sub-acute stage of stroke recovery. Force plate measures of quiet standing balance was evaluated on Concurrent validity against the Berg Balance Scale and discriminative ability for fall history (ρ=-0.490 and -0.440; AUC=0.67, p=≤0.002). Force plate measures of centre of pressure speeds demonstrated moderate concurrent validity (ρ=-0.490 and -0.440, p≤0.002) for quantifying balance during sub-acute stroke recovery.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: