Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Male Sprague-Dawley rats, individually caged, were exposed to low-level irradiation with chronic dosages from a Co/sup 60/ source for 16 hours a day. The animals were selected by weight and growth rate and divided into eight groups of 22 rats. Four groups were kept at 28 cores consistin 1 C and were exposed to 0.29, 0.64, 2.60, and 4.18 r/day during the irradiation period, which lasted from 4 months of age to 16 months of age. The other groups were kept at 35 cores consistin 1 C during the period of irradiation, which lasted from 4 months of age to 16 months of age, and were exposed to 0.28, 0.60, 2.57 and 3.96 r/day. At 35 C the ET/sub 50/ for 0.29 r/day was 310; for 0.64 r/day it was 490; for 2.60 r/day it was 540; and for 4.18 r/day it was 510. At 28 C the ET/ sub 50/ for 0.28 r/day was 493; for 0.60 r/day it was 510; for 2.57 r/day it was 650; and for 3.96 r/day it was 590. With the exception of the relation between 0.60 and 0.28 r/day, the data are statistically significant at the 5% level. From a previous experiment atmore » 26 C the ET/sub 50/ for 0 r/day was 445, and for 0.8 r/day it was 585. It is suggested that the effects of ionizing irradiation interact with the effects of environment in influencing longevity. (auth)« less
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carlson et al. (1959) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: