RESEARCH QUESTION: Is the transcriptome of cumulus cells a good predictor of the embryo's developmental competence? DESIGN: reads in samples grouped according to the developmental potential of their enclosed oocyte: not able to develop to the blastocyst stage (Bl-), able to develop to the blastocyst stage but failing to establish a pregnancy (P-), or able to develop to the blastocyst stage and to establish a clinical pregnancy (P+). RESULTS: The cumulus cell trancriptome was largely independent of the developmental potential as, using a false dscovery rate-adjusted P-value of <0.05, only 10, 11 and 5 genes were differentially expressed for the comparisons P+ versus P-, P+ versus Bl-, and P- versus Bl-, respectively, out of a total of 17,469 genes expressed. Between the differentially expressed genes, those showing little overlap between samples from different groups were CHAC1, up-regulated in the P- and P+ groups compared with the Bl- group, and CENPE, CD93, PECAM1 and HSPA1B, which showed the opposite expression pattern. Focusing on the pregnancy potential, only EPN3 was consistently downregulated in the P+ compared with the P- and Bl- groups. CONCLUSIONS: The cumulus cell transcriptome is largely unrelated to the establishment of clinical pregnancy following embryo transfer, although the expression level of a subset of genes in cumulus cells may indicate the ability to develop to the blastocyst stage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martínez‐Moro et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: