Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to look for a new, simple, and fast method of assessing and monitoring indoor race performance and to assess the relationship between 20 s, 60 s, and 2000 m indoor rowing performances of youth rowers to evaluate their anaerobic profile. Methods: For three consecutive days, 17 young able-bodied male rowers (15.8 ± 2.0 years), performed three tests (20 s, 60 s, and 2000 m) on a rowing ergometer. Mean power (W 20 , W 60 , and W 2000 ) and 2000 m time (t 2000 ) were considered for the analysis. In addition, 14 athletes (15–18 years) performed a 20 s, 60 s, and 2000 m tests and used this as a control group. To define the anaerobic profile of the athletes, W 20 and W 60 were normalized as percentages of W 2000 . Associations between variables were determined by means of the Pearson correlation coefficient ( r ). Results : Mean power decreased with increasing test duration (W 20 = 525.1 ± 113.7 W; W 60 = 476.1 ± 91.0 W; W 2000= 312.9 ± 56.0 W) and negative correlations emerged between t 2000 (418.5 ± 23.1 s) and W 20 ( r = −0.952, p < 0.0001) and W 60 ( r = −0.930, p < 0.0001). Conclusion: These findings indicate that W 20 and W 60 are significant predictors of 2000 m rowing ergometer performances. Furthermore, normalized W 20 and W 60 can be used to evaluate athletes and as a reference for planning anaerobic training sessions, on a rowing ergometer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cerasola et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: