The reaction between sterically crowded, dimeric, arylalane (H 2 AlMes*) 2 and some aryl amines, phosphines, or arsines are described. Treatment of (H 2 AlMes*) 2 (Mes* = 2,4,6-( t -Bu) 3 C 6 H 2 ) with the amines H 2 NPh and H 2 NDipp (Dipp = 2,6-( i -Pr) 2 C 6 H 3 ) affords the monomeric bis(amino)alane products Mes*Al(NHPh) 2 ·Et 2 O ( 1 ·Et 2 O) and Mes*Al(NHDipp) 2 ( 2 ) which feature three-coordinate aluminum and nitrogen centers and short Al−N bonds. Heating of a 1:1 mixture of H 2 AlMes* and aniline under carefully controlled conditions affords the dimer (Mes*AlNPh) 2, 3 . Reaction of (Mes*AlH 2 ) 2 with H 2 PPh or H 2 AsPh at ca. 160 °C gives the trimeric, six-membered-ring compounds (Mes*AlPPh) 3 ·Et 2 O ( 4 ·Et 2 O) and (Mes*AlAsPh) 3 ·Et 2 O ( 5 ·Et 2 O) which are formal valence analogues of borazine. The structure of 3 features a planar Al 2 N 2 core, which also extends to the ipso carbons of the aryl rings; the Al−N distance is 1.824(2) Å. The structures of 4 and 5 have six-membered rings of alternating aluminum and phosphorus or arsenic atoms arranged in a nonplanar boat conformation. Little or no delocalization of the phosphorus or arsenic lone pairs is evident since the average Al−P and Al−As distances are consistent with single bond lengths. Moreover, pyramidal coordination is observed at all the pnictide centers. The structures of 5 and 4 represent respectively the first and second examples of bonding between three-coordinate aluminum and arsenic or phosphorus, whereas 3 represents a unique instance of an Al 2 N 2 ring with organic substituents. The compounds were characterized by 1 H, 13 C, and 31 P ( 4, only) NMR spectroscopy and by X-ray crystallography in the case of 1, 3, 4, and 5 . Crystal data with Cu Kα (λ = 1.54178 Å) radiation at 130 K: 1, a = 10.255(3) Å, b = 16.733(5) Å, c = 19.267(8) Å, β = 95.09(3)°, V = 3293(2) Å 3, Z = 4, space group P 2 1 / c, 3070 ( I > 2σ( I )) data, R = 0.061; 3, a = 8.750(1) Å, b = 9.326(2) Å, c = 14.025(3) Å, α = 101.04(2)°, β = 92.90(1)°, γ = 113.11(1)°, V = 1088.7(4) Å 3, Z = 1, space group P 1̄, 2629 ( I > 2σ( I )) data, R = 0.053; 4, a = 9.383(5) Å, b = 17.719(7) Å, c = 23.603(14) Å, α = 80.86(4)°, β = 82.50(5)°, γ = 75.61°(4), V = 3736(3) Å 3, Z = 2, space group P 1̄, 5626 ( I > 2σ( I )) data, R = 0.084; 5, a = 9.404(7) Å, b = 17.79(2) Å, c = 23.643(10) Å, α = 81.01(6)°, β = 83.04(5)°, γ = 75.68(7)°, V = 3771(5) Å 3, Z = 2, space group P 1̄, 6363 ( I > 2σ( I )) data, R = 0.063.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wehmschulte et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: