Why the study?
Does a contoured end-to-side graft with a cuff improve flow patterns compared to a straight graft without a cuff in vascular graft models?
Does a contoured end-to-side graft with a cuff improve flow patterns compared to a straight graft without a cuff in vascular graft models?
Vascular graft design and flow conditions (retrograde flow) significantly impact flow stagnation and recirculation, which should be considered in bypass graft geometry optimization.
Cuffed grafts alter anastomotic flow in vitro; leaves open whether design changes improve bypass patency.
The shape of a bypass graft plays an important role on its efficacy. Here, we investigated flow through two vascular graft designs-with and without cuff at the anastomosis. We conducted Digital Particle Image Velocimetry (DPIV) measurements to obtain the flow field information through these vascular grafts. Two pulsatile flow waveforms corresponding to cardiac cycles during the rest and the excitation states, with 10% and without retrograde flow out the proximal end of the native artery were examined. In the absence of retrograde flow, the straight end-to-side graft showed recirculation and stagnation regions that lasted throughout the full cardiac cycle with the stagnation region more pronounced in the excitation state. The contoured end-to-side graft had stagnation region that lasted only for a portion of the cardiac cycle and was less pronounced. With 10% retrograde flow, extended stagnation regions under both rest and excitation states for both bypass grafts were eliminated. Our results show that bypass graft designers need to consider both the type of flow waveform and presence of retrograde flow when sculpting an optimal bypass graft geometry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leong et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: