Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A statewide survey of NC schoolchildren found wide variation in dental caries prevalence among sampled classrooms. This study examined factors associated with this variation using classrooms as a surrogate for the larger community, in order to identify community risk indicators (CRI). In all, 172 classrooms (3400 students) in Grades K-6 were available for analysis. Initially, 56 sociodemographic, environmental, health system, and clinical factors were evaluated for their association with caries prevalence (K-3: average dfs + DMFS; 4-6: average DMFS) using univariate and bivariate analyses. Of these, 21 factors met our criteria for evaluation using WLS multivariate regression. For Grades K-3 (n = 108), population density, parental education, and coastal residence were negatively associated with caries scores, while age, and medical and dental, Medicaid expenditures were positive. For Grades 4--6 (n = 64), age and fs:dfs ratio were positively associated with caries scores while population density, population:dentist ratio, and years of natural fluoride exposure were negative. CRIs for both models, when compared to individual models, explained a substantial portion of the variation in caries prevalence, 31% for Grades K-3 and 51% for Grades 4-6. Results suggest that a risk assessment model based on community rather than individual variables is feasible and further refinement may reveal factors useful in identifying high risk communities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Amstutz et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: