AIMS: To verify the efficacy, safety and tolerability of intravesical administration of 0.1% oxybutynin hydrochloride compared to its oral administration for treatment of neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) in a randomized, prospective, controlled, open-label, multi-center trial in 35 adult patients. METHODS: NDO was confirmed within the previous 24 months by urodynamic studies (UDS). Group 1 (n = 18) received 10 ml 0.1% oxybutynin hydrochloride intravesically three times per day and group 2 (n = 17) 5 mg oxybutynin hydrochloride orally three times per day for a period of 28 days. Primary efficacy criterion was the change in the maximum bladder capacity between the beginning of the study and after 4 weeks as assessed by UDS. Adverse drug reactions (ADR) were collected and an evaluation of anticholinergic effects was conducted. RESULTS: The increase in maximum bladder capacity was 117 ml with intravesical application (P = 0.0002) versus 18 ml with the oral application (P = 0.51). The difference was statistically significant (P = 0.0086). ADR were reported by 10 (55.6%) of patients with intravesical administration, and by 14 (82.4%) of patients with oral administration. Significant differences in favor of the intravesical application were observed in ADR affecting vision (1/10 vs. 9/14), gastrointestinal tract (8/10 vs. 14/14), nervous system (2/10 vs. 8/14), and skin and subcutis (1/10 vs. 6/14). No serious adverse drug reactions were reported. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the efficacy and safety of intravesical 0.1% oxybutynin hydrochloride in the treatment of NDO with respect to the increase in maximum bladder capacity. Neurourol. Urodynam. 35:582-588, 2016.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schröder et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: