• Interacting microbubble CO₂ (MBCO₂) dissolution is complex and hard to quantify. • MBCO₂ dissolution was simulated using the Arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian method. • A single 20 μm MBCO₂ disappears in approximately 50 ms. • The interacting MBCO₂–water system reaches CO₂ saturation within a short timescale. • MBCO₂ injection increases CO₂ storage efficiency and reduces injectivity risks. CO₂ microbubble (MBCO₂) injection may broaden the applicability and reduce the injectivity-related risks of carbon capture and storage. However, the MBCO₂ dissolution process is complex and difficult to experimentally quantify. MBCO 2 dissolution was numerically analyzed using the arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian (ALE) method to quantitatively examine dissolution phenomena, including bubble shrinkage, gas migration between phases, and bubble interference using simulations. A single MBCO 2 quickly dissolves and disappears under bottom-hole conditions. One MBCO₂ with a diameter of 20 or 50 µm disappears in approximately 50 or 260 ms, respectively. This difference in dissolution time arises from increases in interfacial surface area and interfacial CO₂ flux per unit area as the bubble size decreases. Furthermore, sensitivity analyses show that the CO₂ solubility and dissolution rates are slightly lower in saline water (3.5 wt.% salinity), and the dissolution still occurs within tens of milliseconds. The main dissolution behavior of MBCO₂ is robust to various bubble sizes and salinity conditions, suggesting the injection conditions are less prone to drying out. Although bubble interference produces residual CO₂ with a high void ratio, the system reaches CO₂ saturation at a similar speed. The dissolved N 2 and O 2 in the liquid phase has limited effects on CO 2 dissolution. These findings suggest that MBCO₂ injection promotes rapid CO₂ dissolution and effectively increases CO₂ storage efficiency. This study provides quantitative insights into bubble dissolution considering the effects of bubble interference and dissolved gas, which are difficult to experimentally observe.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sunouchi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: