Why the study?
Elderly multi-morbid patients face high risks of adverse outcomes from COVID-19, and incident AF worsens outcomes, prompting investigation into incident AF risks using main-effect and machine-learning modeling.
COVID-19 infection is strongly associated with incident atrial fibrillation in elderly patients, and machine learning models can effectively predict this risk based on dynamic multimorbidity changes.
COVID-19 strongly associated with incident AF in elderly multimorbid patients; supports targeted monitoring but leaves causal mechanisms and ML prediction open for prospective validation.
Background The elderly multi-morbid patient is at high risk of adverse outcomes with COVID-19 complications, and in the general population, the development of incident AF is associated with worse outcomes in such patients. We therefore investigated incident AF risks in a large prospective population of elderly patients with/without incident COVID-19 cases and baseline cardiovascular/non-cardiovascular multi-morbidities. We used two approaches: main-effect modeling and secondly, a machine-learning (ML) approach accounting for complex dynamic relationships. Methods We studied a prospective elderly US cohort of 280592 patients from medical databases in a 8-month investigation of new COVID19 cases. Incident AF outcomes were examined in relationship to diverse multi-morbid conditions, COVID-19 status and demographic variables, with ML accounting for the dynamic nature of changing multimorbidity risk factors. Results Multi-morbidity contributed to the onset of confirmed COVID-19 cases with cognitive impairment (OR 1.69; 95%CI 1.52-1.88), anemia (OR 1.41; 95%CI 1.32-1.50), diabetes mellitus (OR 1.35; 95%CI 1.27-1.44) and vascular disease (OR 1.30; 95%CI 1.21-1.39) having the highest associations. A main effect model (C-index value 0.718) showed that COVID-19 had the highest association with incident AF cases (OR 3.12; 95%CI 2.61-3.710, followed by congestive heart failure (1.72; 95%CI 1.50-1.96), then coronary artery disease (OR 1.43; 95%CI 1.27-1.60) and valvular disease (1.42; 95%CI 1.26-1.60). The ML algorithm demonstrated improved discriminatory validity incrementally over the statistical main effect model (training: C-index 0.729, 95%CI 0.718-0.740; validation: C-index 0.704, 95%CI 0.687-0.72). Calibration of ML based formulation was satisfactory and better than the main-effect model. Decision curve analysis demonstrated that the clinical utility for the ML based formulation was better than the ‘treat all’ strategy and the main effect model. Conclusion COVID-19 status has major implications for incident AF in a cohort with diverse cardiovascular/non-cardiovascular multi-morbidities. Our approach accounting for dynamic multimorbidity changes had good prediction for incident AF amongst incident COVID19 cases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ash Genaidy (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: