Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
ASA class may simplify comorbidity assessment in HNCA surgery; leaves open validation versus Charlson for survival prediction.
BACKGROUND: We assessed the American Society of Anesthesiologists' (ASA) class, as a measure of comorbidity in comparison to the commonly used Charlson index for prognostic ability in a HNCA population. METHODS: Proportional hazards methods were applied to head and neck cancer patients whose treatment included surgery by the Johns Hopkins Otolaryngology service (n = 388). RESULTS: The Charlson index and ASA class were modestly correlated (Spearman 0.36, p <.001). Compared with patients with ASA class 1 or 2, those with ASA class 3 or 4 had a two-fold elevated mortality rate (Relative Hazard (RH) = 2.00, 95% CI, 1.38-2.89). This association was stronger than observed for a Charlson index score of 1 or more compared with 0 (RH = 1.59, 95% CI, 1.17-2.17). Both the Charlson index and ASA class adjusted RHs displayed dose-response patterns (p value for trend <.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the Charlson index, the ASA class had comparable if not greater prognostic ability for mortality in this elderly HNCA population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reid et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: