Why the study?
How should new oral anticoagulants be practically managed for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
How should new oral anticoagulants be practically managed for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This review provides case-based practical guidance on selecting new oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation based on patient characteristics.
Practical management of stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) requires physicians to find the optimal balance between maximizing prevention of ischaemic stroke and minimizing the risk of bleeding. Vitamin K antagonists have traditionally been used for stroke prevention in patients with AF; however, they have been associated with increased risk of bleeding, particularly intracranial haemorrhage. New oral anticoagulants (OACs) have shown similar efficacy to the vitamin K antagonist warfarin but with a reduced risk of bleeding, particularly life-threatening bleeding such as intracranial haemorrhage. Decisions about which new OAC therapy to use may be influenced by patient characteristics such as age, renal function, co-medication use, and bleeding risk. This review uses a case-based approach to highlight the practical management issues to be considered by the physician when selecting a new OAC for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jafna L. Cox (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: