Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of DWI using a 5-point rank scale, lesion-to-spinal cord signal intensity ratio, which we refer to as "LSR," and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for the characterization of pulmonary lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After a literature search in several databases, two investigators independently selected studies, assessed methodologic quality, and extracted data. On a per-lesion basis, we pooled and compared the three parameters for malignant and benign lesions. Also, we determined pooled sensitivity and specificity with individual 95% CIs. RESULTS: In total, 31 articles involving 2368 lesions were included. The mean scores of malignant and benign lesions on the 5-point scale were 3.83 (95% CI, 3.71-3.96) and 2.36 (95% CI, 2.18-2.54), respectively. The mean LSRs of malignant and benign lesions were 1.15 (95% CI, 1.07-1.24) and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.62-0.79). The mean ADC values of malignant and benign lesions were 1.23 (95% CI, 1.21-1.24) and 1.72 (95% CI, 1.68-1.77). All three parameters differed significantly between malignant and benign lesions (p < 0.05). On the basis of these parameters, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.88 (95% CI, 0.84-0.91) and 0.75 (95% CI, 0.68-0.80) for the 5-point scale, 0.80 (95% CI, 0.75-0.85) and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.76-0.92) for LSR, and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.82-0.86) and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.81-0.87) for ADC. CONCLUSION: Three DWI parameters-a visual parameter (score on a 5-point scale), semiquantitative parameter (LSR), and quantitative parameter (ADC)-can help to distinguish malignant from benign pulmonary lesions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shen et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: