Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates chloride and iron removal in gas-sweetening systems, suggesting effective corrosion mitigation.
Chloride and dissolved iron impurities in amine-based gas-sweetening systems promote localized corrosion and increase solvent-management costs, yet adsorbents capable of stable operation in alkaline amine media are limited. Here, a biodegradable composite based on functionalized zein nanoparticles and leonardite-derived humic substances (FZNP-LHS) is developed for simultaneous chloride and iron removal from H 2 S/CO 2 -loaded methyldiethanolamine solutions, while mitigating carbon steel corrosion. Structural and spectroscopic analyses reveal a a predominantly amorphous, moderately mesoporous material enriched in oxygen- and nitrogen-containing functional groups, providing abundant accessible adsorption sites. The integrated contaminant-removal data were empirically described more accurately by the Freundlich equation than by the Langmuir equation, with a combined chloride-iron uptake of approximately 45–52 mg g⁻¹ under the investigated conditions. Multi-objective RSM-GA optimization achieves near-complete chloride removal (98%) and high iron removal (91%), accompanied by a consistent reduction in corrosion rate. Electrochemical and 45-day gravimetric measurements indicate measurable corrosion mitigation, accompanied by increased charge-transfer resistance, electrochemical behavior consistent with mixed-type inhibition, and reduced localized attack. Exploratory Random Forest analysis identified adsorption capacity and residual chloride concentration as variables most strongly associated with corrosion behavior. The composite retained approximately 85% of its working capacity over five adsorption–regeneration cycles, demonstrating promising short-term regeneration performance. Screening-level life-cycle and techno-economic analyses suggest competitive environmental and operating performance relative to benchmark materials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Safe et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: