Retrospective multicentre ecological modeling identifies antibiotic use thresholds for healthcare-associated infections, indicating effectiveness for reducing antibiotic resistance.
BACKGROUND Nonlinear analyses show promise for determining antibiotic use thresholds linked to antimicrobial resistance (AMR). An approach that allows aggregation of results from multiple models to capture context-specific AMR dynamics is needed to improve predictive accuracy and define realistic antibiotic use thresholds to reduce AMR.METHODS We conducted TARGET-A, a retrospective multicentre ecological modeling study in four UK hospitals (2020–2024), applying a threshold-logistic ensemble consensus modeling approach to identify hospital-level antibiotic use thresholds and risk scores associated with increasing hospital-onset, healthcare-associated Clostridioides difficile infection (HOHA-CDI) incidence.RESULTS Analysis set the cutoffs for critically high HOHA-CDI incidence at: Antrim Area Hospital (AAH), 75th percentile; Craigavon Area Hospital (CAH), 80th percentile; Pinderfields General Hospital (PGH), 82.5th percentile; St James’s University Hospital (SJUH), 77.5th percentile. Antibiotic use thresholds, expressed as defined daily doses (DDD) per 1,000 occupied bed-days (OBD), were identified as follows: AAH- fluoroquinolones, 62.3, and macrolides, 254.6; CAH- co-amoxiclav, 75.8, and carbapenems, 16.1; PGH- co-amoxiclav, 251.3, and macrolides, 129.2; and SJUH- clindamycin, 14.2, and fluoroquinolones, 128.3. Risk scores for exceeding the high HOHA-CDI incidence were determined to support early-warning alerts. A consensus approach was developed to establish attainable antibiotic use thresholds.CONCLUSIONS This approach provides a framework to define hospital-level quantitative antibiotic use targets to control HOHA-CDI incidence. Further validation is needed in prospective interventional studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aldeyab et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: