Key result
Resilient TIVA decision support requires interoperable datasets, validated simulators, shared control, and transparent regulations.
Why the study?
Total intravenous anesthesia use remains uneven across European centres and relies heavily on population-based drug models and variable monitoring, creating systemic fragility that limits safe, consistent personalization.
Integration of interoperable data, AI-enabled decision support, and multimodal monitoring could improve the safety and resilience of total intravenous anesthesia delivery in Europe.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May limit equitable TIVA access in varied settings; leaves open personalized protocol development for digital anesthesia.
Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) is a well-established technique for general anesthesia and is increasingly relevant to Europe’s transition toward more digital, sustainable, and patient-centred healthcare. However, its use remains uneven across centres and still depends heavily on population-based drug models, variable monitoring practices, and repeated clinician adjustment. Differences in training, data access, device compatibility, patient response, and institutional resources can limit safe and consistent personalization. In this Review, we examine the main sources of fragility in current TIVA practice and discuss how interoperable perioperative data, digital patient simulators, patient-adaptive models, multimodal monitoring, and closed-loop decision support could improve safety and resilience. We emphasize that these technologies should support, not replace, the anesthesiologist, and should remain transparent, clinically supervised, and easy to override. We conclude by outlining priorities for European collaboration in data infrastructure, training, validation, regulation, and evaluation of AI-enabled tools. Ionescu et al. outline a European roadmap for strengthening Total Intravenous Anesthesia Delivery through resilient, human-in-the-loop real-time decision support. Current practice remains uneven and fragile, while interoperable data, validated simulators, adaptive models, robust control, and clear regulation enable safer personalization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ionescu et al. (2026) conducted a review in Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). Computer-guided TIVA and closed-loop decision support was evaluated. Resilient TIVA decision support in Europe requires interoperable perioperative datasets, validated digital patient simulators, human-in-the-loop shared-control systems, and transparent regulatory pathways.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: