Develops a deep learning framework to predict remaining useful life of bearings, indicating improved maintenance reliability.
Self-aligning double-row ball bearings are widely used in rotating machinery, and unexpected bearing failures cause costly downtime; therefore, accurate Remaining Useful Life (RUL) prediction is essential for predictive maintenance. However, bearing degradation signals are non-stationary and run-to-failure datasets are typically limited, which complicates robust data-driven prognostics. Existing methods often train on the entire bearing lifetime, weakening the input–target relationship, while fixed-threshold onset detection is prone to false alarms. This study aims to develop a data-efficient deep learning framework that reliably estimates bearing RUL while explicitly focusing learning on the progressive degradation interval. The study uses a run-to-failure dataset generated on an accelerated test rig developed at the University of Ferrara. It includes six experiments (E1–-E6) sampled at 25.6 kHz, with 5-s vibration recordings collected every 5 minutes under radial loads of 3–-5 kN. The data processing method applies standardization techniques to show degradation patterns before extracting the health indicator for detecting initial signs of degradation. The Short-Time Fourier Transform (STFT) produces spectrograms to show changing time-frequency signal characteristics in the data, preserving the time–frequency evolution essential for capturing non-stationary degradation. A gradient-based criterion is employed to check the slope of the standardized RMS by filtering short-term spikes before passing the data to pre-trained convolutional neural networks (CNNs) adapted for regression task (ResNet, Xception, DenseNet). Transfer learning from ImageNet reduces domain-specific data dependency, making the framework effective under limited run-to-failure data. Experimental validation confirms average absolute RUL errors of 2.7% for DenseNet-201, 2.9% for Xception, and 4.2% for ResNet-18. Onset-aware training reduces the mean absolute error (MAE) by 94% over full-sequence learning, and external transfer evaluation on the PHM benchmark reduces MAE (from 30.8 to 20.1). Validated under controlled constant-speed test-rig conditions, this approach provides accurate bearing RUL predictions and shows strong potential to support predictive maintenance and reduce unexpected failures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hassan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: