Randomized trial explores capacity-constrained dynamics in a unique model, suggesting new insights for stability assessments.
We study a minimal fast-slow model for capacity-constrained accumulation: a smooth saddle-node fast subsystem coupled to a slow field g(x) = α − βk/x, singular at the fold boundary x = 0. Variables are dimensionless. Two are kept distinct: the capacity margin μ = Q − V, and the structural amplitude x, the latent fast order parameter with x2 ≈ μ on the critical branch. Friction couples to the amplitude, F = k/x, so on the branch F ∼ μ−1/2. In the capacity-margin variable the model is a Liénard system whose normalized energy has a strict minimum at the operating equilibrium. That equilibrium is globally asymptotically stable on {x > 0} for every ε > 0, with an explicit amplitude floor (Theorem 1). Write universal forward invariance for forward invariance of {x > 0} at every ε > 0 from every physical datum. It holds if and only if the friction pole is non-integrable, ∫0 h = ∞ (Proposition 3): an integrable coupling, including every regularisation B/(x+δ), loses it for above-capacity data at small ε, while data below an explicit energy level still converge. Away from the fold an isolating-block certificate (Proposition 4) and a two-term transit law (Proposition 5, with off-manifold data in Lemma 3) match measured exit times to 1.4×10−5 in T·ε. The passage depth −μ02/(2εB) + O(1) in ln x is a formal leading asymptotic with numerical support; deep-region matching, the chart gluing, and the quantitative stochastic theory are open; the chart analysis is provided in a companion note. Diagnostics P1–P4 are conditional on a declared frozen-parameter Ornstein–Uhlenbeck regime, whose validity condition D ≪ 4μ3/2 closes as the fold is approached; they test the fold geometry, and the friction coupling has its own protocol. Part of the finite certificate algebra carries Lean 4 kernel proofs (Appendix E), which attest the algebra. Version note (v85): the regularity hypothesis of Proposition 3 is strengthened to h ∈ C1(0, ∞); the pole equivalence is attached to the named property universal forward invariance, with both quantifiers stated; and a new part (iv) proves that an integrable coupling still converges from every datum below the fold energy c*, so integrability costs the universal property and no more. The LaTeX source is deposited alongside the PDF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
James Kovalenko (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: