Key result
Perioperative RAAS inhibitors are linked to ~40% higher 1-year revision risk after shoulder arthroplasty.
Why the study?
RAAS inhibitors have proposed antifibrotic and bone-protective effects, but their impact on outcomes following total shoulder arthroplasty remains unclear.
Does perioperative RAAS inhibitor use reduce antifibrotic procedures or improve outcomes in patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty?
Cohort (n=117,080)
Yes
Does perioperative RAAS inhibitor use reduce antifibrotic procedures or improve outcomes in patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty?
Perioperative RAAS inhibitor use in total shoulder arthroplasty is associated with higher rates of medical complications and revision, without providing antifibrotic benefits.
Purpose Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), are commonly prescribed antihypertensive medications with proposed antifibrotic and bone-protective effects. Their impact on outcomes following total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) remains unclear. This study evaluates the association between perioperative RAAS inhibitor exposure and postoperative outcomes after TSA. Methods A retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX network identified patients undergoing primary shoulder arthroplasty (2005–2025), stratified by ACEi or ARB use. One-to-one propensity score matching was performed. Outcomes included 90-day medical complications and 1-year mechanical complications and revision. Results Post-matching, 27,938 patients per cohort (ARB vs. control) and 30,602 per cohort (ACEi vs. control) were included. Neither ARB nor ACEi use reduced rates of manipulation under anesthesia or capsular release at one year. Both cohorts had higher 90-day rates of emergency department visits, readmission, myocardial infarction, and acute renal failure. ACEi use was additionally associated with pulmonary embolism, deep-vein thrombosis, transfusion, and sepsis. At one year, both cohorts showed higher rates of periprosthetic joint infection, aseptic loosening, and revision. Dislocation risk was increased with ACEi use only. Conclusion Perioperative RAAS inhibitor use was not associated lower rates of antifibrotic procedures following TSA. Instead, RAAS inhibitor use was associated with higher rates of several perioperative medical complications and longer-term surgical events, including infection and revision. ACE inhibitor exposure demonstrated a broader complication profile compared with ARB exposure. However, because patients receiving RAAS inhibitors often have greater comorbidity burden, these findings should be interpreted as associative rather than causal. Level of evidence III Retrospective Cohort Study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parmar et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Primary total shoulder arthroplasty (n=117,080). Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors vs. No RAAS inhibitor exposure was evaluated on 1-year revision arthroplasty (ARB vs. Control) (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.24-1.59, p=<0.001). Perioperative exposure to RAAS inhibitors was not associated with antifibrotic benefits but was associated with higher rates of 1-year revision (OR 1.40 for ARBs) and medical complications following shoulder arthroplasty.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: