Demonstrates improved gas adsorption in MoOFOUR-1-Ni, indicating optimized force fields enhance performance.
Context Anion-pillared metal–organic frameworks (APMOFs) have emerged as promising materials for natural gas purification, owing to the strong electrostatic fields generated by high-charge-density ionic pillars. However, accurately describing these highly localized interactions within classical force field frameworks remains challenging, as generic parameterizations such as the Universal Force Field (UFF) and DREIDING fail to capture the specific polarization effects of ionic active sites. In this work, we address this limitation for MoOFOUR-1-Ni, an APMOF exhibiting high CO _2 2 selectivity over N _2 2 and CH _4 4 , by developing a system-specific force field for the [MoO_4]^2- [ MoO 4 ] 2 - pillar through a DFT-guided parametrization workflow. The optimized Lennard–Jones parameters were validated against experimental adsorption isotherms for all three gases, yielding a five-fold reduction in mean absolute error for CO _2 2 relative to UFF+DREIDING, and very good agreement for N _2 2 and CH _4 4 . The results highlight the inherent substrate-specificity of the derived parameters and the fundamental limitations of transferable force fields in chemically complex ionic environments. Methods Potential energy curves for the interactions between the [MoO_4]^2- [ MoO 4 ] 2 - anion and CO _2 2 , N _2 2 , and CH _4 4 were computed at the PBE-D3(BJ)/def2-TZVPD level of theory using ORCA 6.0.1. Partial charges were obtained via the CHELPG method as implemented in Multiwfn. Lennard–Jones parameters were optimized using the L-BFGS-B algorithm, minimizing a regularized objective function combining mean absolute deviation from DFT reference energies and a quadratic penalty term. Grand Canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) adsorption isotherms were simulated using RASPA on a $${
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Torres et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: