The relative effectiveness of Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) derived normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and short-wave infrared/near infrared index (SWIR/NIR) for measuring different types of damage in several forest communities was examined and compared. Study areas included: (1) Twin Mountain, New Hampshire, a site with well-defined fir waves; (2) Camels Hump mountain, Vermont, a site undergoing well-documented coniferous forest decline; and (3) a predominantly deciduous region seriously impacted by pear thrips in southern Vermont and north-western Massachusetts. Results indicated that the SWIR/NIR was excellent in distinguishing between high and low conifer damage for both fir wave and forest decline sites. The NDVI was less satisfactory in these conifer-dominated sites. High and low deciduous damage sites were easily separable using both NDVI and SWIR/NIR. The NDVI also allowed excellent separation between medium and low deciduous damage. Results from this study suggest that both indices are appropriate for global-scale monitoring of vegetation, with the SWIR/NIR being suitable for monitoring both deciduous and coniferous conditions and the NDVI being appropriate for monitoring broadleaf conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
James E. Vogelmann (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: