Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Professor Mirus asserts th at there is a need to explore the extent to which student evaluation of teachers is subject to manipulation by the instructor. He comments on the possible impact on teacher ratings of increasing section sizes, scheduling of classes during “odd hours,” the type of material taught, and whether or not the course is required. His statistical analysis revealed that requiring a course had no negative impact, nor did class size, scheduling classes during odd hours, or giving courses a quantitative orientation. There was a “strong indication,” however, that the expected grade was a major determinate of the professor's rating.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rolf Mirus (1973) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: