Why the study?
Does automatic visceral fat volume calculation software accurately measure visceral fat compared to manual segmentation in whole-body CT data?
Does automatic visceral fat volume calculation software accurately measure visceral fat compared to manual segmentation in whole-body CT data?
The newly developed software provides highly accurate and time-efficient automatic calculation of visceral fat volumes from CT data.
Automatic VF quantification is highly accurate and efficient; leaves open clinical workflow integration and outcome impact.
OBJECTIVE: To develop automatic visceral fat volume calculation software for computed tomography (CT) volume data and to evaluate its feasibility. METHODS: A total of 24 sets of whole-body CT volume data and anthropometric measurements were obtained, with three sets for each of four BMI categories (under 20, 20 to 25, 25 to 30, and over 30) in both sexes. True visceral fat volumes were defined on the basis of manual segmentation of the whole-body CT volume data by an experienced radiologist. Software to automatically calculate visceral fat volumes was developed using a region segmentation technique based on morphological analysis with CT value threshold. Automatically calculated visceral fat volumes were evaluated in terms of the correlation coefficient with the true volumes and the error relative to the true volume. RESULTS: Automatic visceral fat volume calculation results of all 24 data sets were obtained successfully and the average calculation time was 252.7 seconds/case. The correlation coefficients between the true visceral fat volume and the automatically calculated visceral fat volume were over 0.999. CONCLUSIONS: The newly developed software is feasible for calculating visceral fat volumes in a reasonable time and was proved to have high accuracy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nemoto et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: