Why the study?
Compromised cerebral blood flow increases ischemic event risk in symptomatic carotid artery disease, but the hemodynamic impact of carotid stenosis is rarely evaluated.
Does reduced internal carotid artery blood flow rate correlate with compromised cerebral blood flow in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis?
Does reduced internal carotid artery blood flow rate correlate with compromised cerebral blood flow in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis?
Reduced internal carotid artery blood flow, rather than stenosis degree alone, is associated with compromised cerebral blood flow and insufficient collateral recruitment in symptomatic carotid stenosis.
Reduced ICA BFR may better reflect cerebral hemodynamics than stenosis alone; leaves open whether flow assessment refines ischemic risk stratification.
Background Compromised cerebral blood flow has been identified as a contributing risk factor for future ischemic events in patients with symptomatic carotid artery disease. Nevertheless, the hemodynamic impact of carotid stenosis is rarely evaluated. The aim of this observational cross-section study was to investigate how a reduced internal carotid artery (ICA) blood flow rate (BFR), rather than stenosis degree, relates to BFR in the cerebral arteries. Methods Four-dimensional phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (4D-PCMRI) was used to measure cerebral blood flow in 38 patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (≥50%), being considered for carotid endarterectomy. The BFR in the cerebral arteries was compared between two subgroups that were based on the BFR in the symptomatic (ipsilateral) ICA: I. reduced ICA flow (<160 mL/min) i.e., 2 SD <normal ICA BFR; II. preserved ICA flow (≥160 mL/min). Furthermore, BFR laterality was defined as a difference in the paired ipsilateral-contralateral arteries within the groups. Results The degree of stenosis was not significantly different between the two subgroups (72% vs. 80%; P =0.09). In the reduced group compared to the preserved ICA flow group, a reduced BFR was found in the ipsilateral middle cerebral artery (MCA) (108±32 vs. 136±24 mL/min; P <0.01) and anterior cerebral artery (A1 segment) (−6±47 vs. 81±27 mL/min; P <0.001), while the BFR was increased in the contralateral A1 segment (152±79 vs. 82±41 mL/min; P <0.001). There was also a reversed BFR in the posterior communicating artery and ophthalmic artery on the ipsilateral side in the group with reduced ICA flow. BFR laterality was observed in all paired arteries in the reduced ICA flow group ( P <0.05), while there was no laterality in the preserved ICA flow group ( P >0.05). Conclusions 4D-PCMRI revealed compromised cerebral blood flow in patients with carotid stenosis, not possible to detect by solely analyzing the stenosis degree. In patients with reduced ICA flow, collateral recruitment was not sufficient to maintain symmetrical BFR distribution to the two hemispheres.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zarrinkoob et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: