Why the study?
Most research on Nordic hamstring exercises has been undertaken in soccer, yet they have become popular in Australian Rules football despite high injury rates and a lack of relevant evidence.
Does Nordic hamstring exercises (NHE) prevent hamstring injuries in Australian Rules football (ARF) players?
Does Nordic hamstring exercises (NHE) prevent hamstring injuries in Australian Rules football (ARF) players?
Nordic hamstring exercises may not be an appropriate or sufficient preventative measure for hamstring injuries in Australian Rules football due to lack of sport-specific movement replication.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
NHE adoption in Australian football lacks code-specific evidence; leaves open whether soccer-derived benefits apply elsewhere.
Nordic hamstring exercises (NHE) are promoted as an evidence-based strategy for reducing the prevalence of hamstring injuries in football, with a number of studies showing a significant reduction in hamstring injury rates following implementation of a NHE-based program. However, most of the research to date has been undertaken in soccer with less research carried out in other football codes. Despite this lack of relevant evidence, NHE has recently become popular as a preventative measure in Australian Rules football (ARF) teams; however, hamstring injuries remain high. This paper reviews the literature associated with the use of NHE for ARF players and questions the appropriateness of this exercise approach as a preventative measure for hamstring injuries in this sport. When considering the use of a preventative exercise program, such as the NHE, the specific risks associated with the sporting activity should be considered and the evidence reviewed in light of this. Whilst NHE provides an easy way to do eccentric exercises, the movement does not replicate what is needed in the real world for ARF and should therefore be included in a hamstring injury prevention program in this code with caution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Milanese et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: