Why the study?
What is the role of genetic testing in identifying and managing young athletes with inherited primitive cardiac disorders at risk of sudden cardiac death?
What is the role of genetic testing in identifying and managing young athletes with inherited primitive cardiac disorders at risk of sudden cardiac death?
While genetic testing facilitates the molecular confirmation of inherited cardiac disorders in athletes, its clinical utility is complicated by limited sensitivity (~50%) and the potential for uncertain findings.
Clinicians should heighten suspicion for IPCDs in athlete SCD despite rarity; leaves open standardized criteria for borderline cases.
Although relatively rare, inherited primitive cardiac disorders (IPCDs) in athletes have a deep social impact since they often present as sudden cardiac death (SCD) of young and otherwise healthy persons. The diagnosis of these conditions is likely underestimated due to the lack of shared clinical criteria and to the existence of several borderline clinical pictures. We will focus on the clinical and molecular diagnosis of the most common IPCDs, namely hypertrophic cardiomyopathies, long QT syndrome, arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, and left ventricular non-compaction. Collectively, these conditions account for the majority of SCD episodes and/or cardiologic clinical problems in athletes. In addition to the clinical and instrumental tools for the diagnosis of IPCD, the viral technological advances in genetic testing have facilitated the molecular confirmation of these conditions. However, genetic testing presents several issues: the limited sensitivity (globally, around 50%), the low prognostic predictive value, the probability to find pathogenic variants in different genes in the same patient, and the risk of non-interpretable results. In this review, we will analyze the pros and cons of the different clinical approaches for the presymptomatic identification, the diagnosis and management of IPCD athletes, and we will discuss the indications to the genetic testing for patients and their relatives, particularly focusing on the most complex scenarios, such as presymptomatic tests, uncertain results, and unexpected findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tiziano et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: