While Cu is the only electrocatalyst that converts CO 2 into meaningful quantities of CH 4 fuel, it requires significant overpotentials (onset potential of ∼−0.80 V vs RHE), decreasing energy conversion efficiencies. We report that Mo 2 C is capable of catalyzing CO 2 into CH 4 at low potentials (onset potential of ∼−0.55 V vs RHE), where Cu electrocatalysts do not convert CO 2 . This low-overpotential catalyst was first identified as a candidate by electronic structure calculations, which indicated the free energetics of CO hydrogenation to be more favorable than that on conventional transition metals such as Cu. Despite the low onset potential for CH 4, the CH 4 has a steep Tafel slope (∼−280 mV/dec), resulting in most of the current passing through the Mo 2 C electrocatalysts being utilized for the competitive hydrogen evolution reaction. We conducted a detailed theoretical analysis on the basis of density functional theory calculations, microkinetic analysis, and simulated Pourbaix diagrams to suggest the reasons for these characteristics. These analyses suggest that the potential-limiting step in CH 4 evolution is the clearing of OH from the surface, while the rate-limiting step is the nonelectrochemical C–O bond scission, resulting in a high OH coverage and a high Tafel slope. Our calculations suggest that this high coverage weakens H binding, causing enhancement of the H 2 evolution reaction in comparison to that under CO 2 -free conditions. This analysis shows that the detailed interaction of theory and experiment can be used to design and analyze operational electrocatalysts for CO 2 reduction and other complicated electrocatalytic reactions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: