Why the study?
Acute pulmonary edema has been reported after transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation, but the impact of the procedure on left ventricular diastolic function had not been established.
Does transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation impact left ventricular systolic and diastolic function differently based on pre-implantation physiology in patients with pulmonary valve disease?
Does transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation impact left ventricular systolic and diastolic function differently based on pre-implantation physiology in patients with pulmonary valve disease?
Transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation does not cause haemodynamically significant acute or 1-year changes in left ventricular systolic or diastolic function, regardless of pre-implantation physiology.
TPVI raises no acute LV function concerns in practice; extends observational hemodynamics but leaves open prospective validation in subgroups.
OBJECTIVES: Assess the acute and short-term haemodynamic impact of transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation on left ventricular systolic and diastolic function stratified by pre-transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation physiology. BACKGROUND: Transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation is a widely available option to treat residual or recurrent pulmonary stenosis and pulmonary insufficiency. Transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation acutely increases pulmonary artery size and diastolic pressure in patients with pulmonary insufficiency and acute pulmonary edema has been reported after transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation, possibly related to acute left ventricular volume loading. However, the impact of transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation on left ventricular diastolic function has not been established. METHODS: Patients who underwent transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation from 2010 to 2017 at our centre were grouped by indication for transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation as pulmonary stenosis, pulmonary insufficiency, or mixed disease. Separate analysis was performed on those who underwent transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation for pulmonary stenosis versus pulmonary insufficiency or mixed disease. Intracardiac haemodynamics immediately before and after transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation and echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular systolic and diastolic function at baseline, 1-day post transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation, and 1-year post transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation were compared between groups. RESULTS: In 102 patients who underwent transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation, the indication was pulmonary stenosis in 29 (28%), pulmonary insufficiency in 28 (29%), and mixed disease in 44 (43%). There were no significant differences in left ventricular systolic or diastolic function between groups at baseline, immediately after transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation, or 1-year post implantation. The mean pulmonary artery wedge pressure increased equally across groups. CONCLUSIONS: While patients with pulmonary insufficiency likely have acute left ventricular volume loading following transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation, this does not appear to be haemodynamically significant as transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation was not associated with measurable changes in left ventricular systolic or diastolic function acutely or 1-year post implantation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Romans et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: