cis,trans -Os(H) 2 (OTf)(NO)(P i Pr 3 ) 2 ( 1-OTf ) and several other precursors ( 1-X ) to Os(H) 2 (NO)(P i Pr 3 ) 2 + ( 1 + ) react with (Me 3 Si) 2 NLi, (Me 3 Si) 2 CHLi, lithium 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidide (TMPLi), Me 3 SiCH 2 Li, and B(CH 2 SiMe 3 ) 4 - by a highly unusual, facile β-Me - transfer, the exclusive reaction pathway for the first two in nonpolar solvents. A series of lithium alkyls and alkylamides and organoborate reagents have been examined to reveal widespread occurrence of the direct β-R‘ - transfer (R‘ = H, Me) to the Os electrophile, being completely selective for β-H - over β-Me -, with the sole (surprising) exception of NpLi. The β-R‘ elimination was ruled out as the mechanism of the net β-R‘ - transfer for two representative RLi cases with R‘ = H, Me, and a single-electron-transfer mechanism was shown to be inoperative for tetraalkylborates. The mechanistic studies also uncovered the important role of Li in RLi and R 2 NLi, which acts as a potent Lewis acid to abstract the halide/pseudohalide X from 1-X in generating the unsaturated Os species. The proposed intimate mechanism of Me−C and Me−Si bond cleavage is a direct S E 2 substitution at carbon with inversion of the Me group, supported by DFT calculations. While the imines formed in the process of C−H and C−Me cleavage are lithiated by, and compete for the Os with, the original base, the unsaturated silicon species formed by Si−Me cleavage react with the remaining base by 1,2-addition of (N,C)-Li, forming intermediates that are also reactive by β-Me - transfer. A complex mixture of Os-free coproducts is obtained in both cases. The structural features of 1 + responsible for its unusual reactivity are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yandulov et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: