Key result
Gene coexpression network analysis identifies 24 modules and key driver genes in coronary heart disease.
Case-Control (n=376)
OBJECTIVE: Genetic approaches have identified numerous loci associated with coronary heart disease (CHD). The molecular mechanisms underlying CHD gene-disease associations, however, remain unclear. We hypothesized that genetic variants with both strong and subtle effects drive gene subnetworks that in turn affect CHD. APPROACH AND RESULTS: We surveyed CHD-associated molecular interactions by constructing coexpression networks using whole blood gene expression profiles from 188 CHD cases and 188 age- and sex-matched controls. Twenty-four coexpression modules were identified, including 1 case-specific and 1 control-specific differential module (DM). The DMs were enriched for genes involved in B-cell activation, immune response, and ion transport. By integrating the DMs with gene expression-associated single-nucleotide polymorphisms and with results of genome-wide association studies of CHD and its risk factors, the control-specific DM was implicated as CHD causal based on its significant enrichment for both CHD and lipid expression-associated single-nucleotide polymorphisms. This causal DM was further integrated with tissue-specific Bayesian networks and protein-protein interaction networks to identify regulatory key driver genes. Multitissue key drivers (SPIB and TNFRSF13C) and tissue-specific key drivers (eg, EBF1) were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Our network-driven integrative analysis not only identified CHD-related genes, but also defined network structure that sheds light on the molecular interactions of genes associated with CHD risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huan et al. (2013) conducted a case-control in Coronary Heart Disease (n=376). Coronary heart disease (genetic/molecular profile) vs. Age- and sex-matched controls was evaluated on Identification of coexpression modules and key driver genes associated with CHD.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: