Why the study?
Pregnancy complications including growth restriction are linked to serious morbidities, and the relationship between first-trimester uterine artery Doppler indices and intrauterine growth retardation in small-for-gestational-age newborns needed examination.
Do first-trimester uterine artery Doppler indices predict small for gestational age and intrauterine growth restriction in low-risk pregnancies?
Do first-trimester uterine artery Doppler indices predict small for gestational age and intrauterine growth restriction in low-risk pregnancies?
First-trimester uterine artery Doppler indices, specifically PI and RI, may be useful in predicting intrauterine growth restriction and small-for-gestational-age newborns in low-risk pregnancies.
First-trimester uterine artery Doppler may flag SGA risk; leaves open whether screening improves outcomes before prospective validation.
Background: Pregnancy complications including growth restriction are linked to serious morbidities such foetal death and long-term neurodevelopmental impairments. for gestational age, small (SGA), which can have a variety of reasons, is frequently associated with placental insufficiency. Aim and objectives: to examine the relationship between the first-trimester uterine artery Doppler indices and the intrauterine growth retardation (UGR) in postpartum small-for-gestational-age (SGA) new borns (IUGR). Subjects and methods; A prospective observational research involving 120 patients was carried out.The study was conducted at Al-Azhar University hospitals. The duration of the study ranged from 6-12 months. Result: When it comes to uterine artery Indices by Doppler and notching, there is a substantial difference between the three groups that were analysed. Thus, RI and PI were significantly highest in IUGR group and lowest in normal group. Conclusion: By measuring UtA-PI and Small-for-gestational-age (SGA) and intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) can be predicted using first-trimester uterine artery Doppler (IUGR).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gebreil et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: