Why the study?
Understanding patients' involvement, confidence, and capability to engage with self-management and rehabilitation could help guide individualized supportive strategies following critical illness.
ICU survivors exhibit low levels of patient activation, which correlates with higher support needs during recovery, highlighting the need for individualized supportive strategies.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PAM assessment identifies activation levels and support needs in ICU survivors; leaves open whether it guides effective individualized strategies.
Background: Understanding the degree to which patients are actively involved, confident and capable of engaging with self-management and rehabilitation could be an initial step in guiding individualised supportive strategies for people after critical illness. Aims: To assess the levels of active involvement with self management among ICU survivors using the Patient Activation Measure (PAM), explore associations between patient characteristics and PAM results, and investigate its relationship with patients’ support needs at key transition points during the recovery process. Methods: Eligible participants received both the PAM and Support Needs After Critical care (SNAC) questionnaires by post. The return of the completed questionnaires was considered as consent to participate. Ethical approval was obtained (17/NI/0236). Descriptive statistics were used to summarise the data and Pearson’s coefficient for correlations between variables. Findings: There were 200 completed PAM and SNAC questionnaires. PAM scores showed that levels of active involvement with self management fell into level 1 ( n = 64; disengaged and overwhelmed, low confidence to self manage) and 2 ( n = 70; still struggling), with considerably less participants achieving scores in level 3 ( n = 51; taking action) and 4 ( n = 15; pushing further). Lower patient activation levels were associated with higher support needs (r = −0.16, p = 0.02). Conclusion: We found that patient activation levels are low implying low knowledge, skills and confidence to self-manage after critical illness, and also that patients have support needs at various timepoints during recovery. Future research should focus on a longitudinal study to track changes in activation and support needs in the same patients over time and identify effective strategies to optimise recovery after critical illness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
O’Neill et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: