Why the study?
The study was conducted to test whether the potassium channel opener retigabine can prevent episodic loss of force in hypokalemic periodic paralysis.
Does retigabine prevent or reverse the loss of force in a mouse model of hypokalemic periodic paralysis?
Does retigabine prevent or reverse the loss of force in a mouse model of hypokalemic periodic paralysis?
Retigabine effectively prevents and reverses low-potassium induced weakness in a mouse model of hypokalemic periodic paralysis at clinically relevant concentrations.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hypothesis-generating for retigabine in HypoPP; human trials needed before clinical consideration.
Objective The goal of this experimental study was to test the hypothesis that the potassium channel opener retigabine can prevent the episodic loss of force in hypokalemic periodic paralysis (HypoPP). Methods A knock-in mutant mouse model of HypoPP ( Scn4a p.R669H) was used to determine whether pretreatment with retigabine suppressed the loss of force, or post-treatment hastened recovery of force for a low-K + challenge in an ex vivo contraction assay. Results Retigabine completely prevents the loss of force induced by a 2 mM K + challenge (protection) in our mouse model of HypoPP, with a 50% inhibitory concentration (IC 50 ) of 0.8 µM. In comparison, the effective concentration for the K ATP channel opener pinacidil was ten-fold higher. Application of retigabine also reversed the loss of force (rescue) for HypoPP muscle maintained in 2 mM K + . Interpretation Retigabine, a selective agonist of the K V 7 family of potassium channels, is effective for the prevention of low-K + induced attacks of weakness and to enhance recovery from an on-going loss of force in a mouse model of HypoPP. Substantial protection from the loss of force occurred in the low micromolar range, well within the therapeutic window for retigabine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Quiñonez et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: