Key result
Lower BMI and waist circumference cutoffs optimally detect cardiometabolic risk vs current reference thresholds.
Cross-Sectional (n=295)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: A body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m(2) and a waist circumference (WC) ≥80 cm in women (WCF) or ≥90 cm in men (WCM) are reference cardiometabolic risk markers (CMM) for Mexicans adults. However, their reliability to predict other CMM (index tests) in young Mexicans has not been studied in depth. METHODS: A cross-sectional descriptive study evaluating several anthropometric, physiological and biochemical CMM from 295 young Mexicans was performed. Sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp) and Youden's index (J) of reference BMI/WC cutoffs toward other CMM (n = 14) were obtained and their most reliable cutoffs were further calculated at Jmax. RESULTS: Prevalence, incidence and magnitude of most CMM increased along the BMI range (p < 0.01). BMI explained 81 % of WC's variance [Se (97 %), Sp (71 %), J (68 %), Jmax (86 %), BMI = 30 kg/m(2)] and 4-50 % of other CMM. The five most prevalent (≥71 %) CMM in obese subjects were high WC, low HDL-C, and three insulin-related CMM [Fasting insulin, HOMA-IR, and QUICKI]. For a BMI = 30 kg/m(2), J ranged from 16 % (HDL-C/LDL-C) to 68 % (WC), being moderately reliable (Jmax = 61-67) to predict high uric acid (UA), metabolic syndrome (MetS) and the hypertriglyceridemic-waist phenotype (HTGW). Corrected WCM/WCF were moderate-highly reliable (Jmax = 66-90) to predict HTGW, MetS, fasting glucose and UA. Most CMM were moderate-highly predicted at 27 ± 3 kg/m(2) (CI 95 %, 25-28), 85 ± 5 cm (CI 95 %, 82-88) and 81 ± 6cm (CI 95 %, 75-87), for BMI, WCM and WCF, respectively. CONCLUSION: BMI and WC are good predictors of several CMM in the studied population, although at different cutoffs than current reference values.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wall‐Medrano et al. (2016) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiometabolic risk (n=295). Body mass index and waist circumference vs. Standard reference cutoffs was evaluated on Optimal cutoffs for predicting cardiometabolic risk markers (p=<0.01). BMI and waist circumference optimally predicted cardiometabolic risk markers at lower cutoffs (BMI 27 kg/m2, WC 85 cm in men and 81 cm in women) than current reference values.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: