The feasibility of a moving-bank multiple model adaptive estimator/controller is examined. Compared to a conventional full-bank multiple model adaptive algorithm, a significant reduction in the number of required elemental filters is accomplished through a dynamic re-declaration of the positions in parameter space that the elemental filters occupy. Critical to the performance of the moving-bank estimator is the decision method that governs movement of the bank of elemental filters. Five such methods are developed and their performances are compared to each other and to a benchmark filter with artificial knowledge of the true parameter value. Three adaptive controller algorithms are also generated and evaluated. A simple but physically motivated example is used to gain insights into relative performance potential of the proposed algorithms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maybeck et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: