Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The moment method and the uniform geometrical theory of diffraction are used to obtain two separate solutions for theE-plane far field pattern of an aperture-matched horn antenna. This particular horn antenna consists of a standard pyramidal horn with the following modifications: a rolled edge section attached to the aperture edges and a curved throat section. The resulting geometry provides significantly better performance in terms of the pattern, impedance, and frequency characteristics than normally obtainable. The moment method is used to calculate theE-plane pattern and voltage standing-wave ratio (VSWR) of the antenna. However, at higher frequencies, the moment method requires large amounts of computation time. On the other hand, the uniform geometrical theory of diffraction provides a quick and efficient high frequency solution for theE-plane field pattern. In fact, the uniform geometrical theory of diffraction may be used to initially design the antenna; then the moment method may be applied to "fine tune" it. In both methods, a two-dimensionalE-plane model of the antenna is used, but these two-dimensional solutions yield excellent agreement with measured data of the actual three-dimensional antenna. This procedure has been successfully applied to design a compact range feed horn.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heedy et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: