Is all theatre political? Some people claim that it is. To some extent, this view is based upon a misunderstanding of the word “political.” Webster defines “political” as: 1. of or concerned with government, the state, or politics. 2. having a definite governmental organization. 3. engaged in or taking sides in politics; as political parties. 4. of or characteristic of political parties or politicians: as political pressure. These definitions may help us to understand the nature of political theatre, but they do not apply to all theatrical activity. Some of the people who claim that all theatre is political seem to confuse “political,” “social,” and “economic.” Of course, all theatre exists in a certain socio-economic context. By definition, it involves an audience; it is not a solitary activity. But this does not mean that it necessarily is concerned with government or that it must take sides in politics. The psychological elements and interpersonal relationships of, say, A Streetcar Named Desire may be magnified into social statements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michael Kirby (1975) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: