Why the study?
The study was conducted to survey potential candidates for bariatric/metabolic surgery regarding their procedure preferences.
What are the procedure preferences among Korean obese candidates for bariatric/metabolic surgery?
What are the procedure preferences among Korean obese candidates for bariatric/metabolic surgery?
Korean candidates for bariatric surgery most strongly prefer sleeve gastrectomy, primarily due to expectations of excellent weight loss.
Patient preferences align with guidelines favoring SG; leaves open impact of incorporating choices on adherence or outcomes.
Purpose: The objective of this study was to survey potential candidates for bariatric/metabolic surgery for procedure preferences. Methods: Questions asked were divided into 5 categories: (1) demographic and anthropometric data, comorbidities, and favored surgery; (2) awareness of safety, effectiveness, and complications of each type of surgery; (3) discordances in opinion between self-selected and medically recommended procedures; and (4, 5) reasons for/against particular surgery. Results: From 1 October to 15 November 2018, 104 respondents adequately responded and were included in the analysis. The number (%) of female respondents was 79 (76.0%). The number (%) of respondents by decade was 17 (16.3%) in their 20s, 65 (62.5%) in their 30s, 19 (18.3%) in their 40s, and 3 (2.9%) in their 60s, respectively. Mean body mass index was 37.1 6.3 kg/m 2 . Comorbidities were type 2 diabetes in 34 (32.7%) and hypertension in 35 (33.7%). The most favored procedure was sleeve gastrectomy (SG) in 78 (75.0%), adjustable gastric band (AGB) surgery in 12 (11.5%), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) in 6 (5.8%), and gastric plication (GP) in 8 (7.7%). Major reasons for choosing procedures were; "adjustable" for AGB, "stomach sparing" for GP, "excellent weight loss" for SG, and "comorbidity resolution" in RYGB. Conclusion: Candidates for bariatric/metabolic surgery favored SG followed by AGB, GP, and RYGB, and their choices were compatible with current evidence-based clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roh et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: