The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of magnification requirement on the effectiveness of low vision aids in patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD). 656 AMD-patients underwent careful administration of low vision aids and were trained to read with prescribed visual aids for at least 30 minutes. Main outcome measures were: magnification requirement, prescribed low vision aids, reading speed [words per minute = wpm] before and after providing of low vision aids. Mean magnification requirement (MR) was 8.0 ± 6.2 fold, 257 patients had a MR up to 3-fold (Grade 1), 101 patients between 4 to 6-fold (Grade 2) and in 298 patients MR was more than 6-fold (Grade 3). The visual rehabilitation was sufficient with optical low-vision aids in 54%. In 44.5% electronic closed-circuit TV systems were necessary. Only 1.5% of the patients needed an electronic reading device. For the whole group, reading speed (wpm) was on average 12 ± 25 without and increased significantly up to 71 ± 33 with visual aids. There are significant differences (p < 0.0001) of reading speed in three magnification grades before (Grade 1, Grade 2, Grade 3: 27 ± 33, 7.4 ± 14, 0.3 ± 3.0) and after rehabilitation (95 ± 28, 72 ± 24, 46 ± 20, respectively). Patients with a lower magnification requirement (up to 6-fold) showed a significantly higher increase of reading speed than patients with higher magnification requirement (> 6-fold) (p < 0.0001). These results provide quantitative data concerning the success of rehabilitation for AMD-patients with regard to magnification requirement. This important option should be considered early in order to help patients maintain their reading ability, independence and mental agility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nguyen et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: