Why the study?
Because psychosocial factors are related to chest pain, there is a need to explore accompanying family functioning and mental health problems in adolescents with non-cardiac chest pain.
Is non-cardiac chest pain in adolescents associated with higher rates of depression, anxiety, and impaired family functioning compared to matched controls?
Is non-cardiac chest pain in adolescents associated with higher rates of depression, anxiety, and impaired family functioning compared to matched controls?
Non-cardiac chest pain in adolescents is strongly associated with underlying mental health problems and impaired family functioning, highlighting the need for psychosocial screening in this population.
Psychosocial screening may warrant consideration in non-cardiac chest pain; leaves open whether family or mental health interventions alter outcomes.
Chest pain is highly prevalent in adolescence, represents a considerable burden for health services, and rarely associated with cardiac disease. Since psychosocial factors are related to chest pain there is a need for exploring the accompanying family functioning and mental health problems in adolescents with non-cardiac chest pain. Here, we assessed these determinants in 68 adolescents with non-cardiac chest pain and 68 age and-sex matched control participants using the 4-item Patient Health Questionnaire-4 for a brief screening for anxiety and depression and the Family APGAR Scale to assess the perception of family functioning. Adolescents with non-cardiac chest pain reported more depression, anxiety and experienced impaired family functioning (p=0.003, p<0.001, p<0.001). The results indicated that non-cardiac chest pain is a warning sign of an underlying mental health problem with accompanying family issues and it deserves further psychosocial investigation including anxiety, depression, and impaired satisfaction of the adolescents’ family’s responsiveness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
AKMAZ et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: