Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
To identify novel vitamin D receptor (VDR) ligands that induce a novel architecture within the ligand-binding pocket (LBP), we have investigated eight 22-butyl-1alpha,24-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) derivatives (3-10), all having a butyl group as the branched alkyl side chain. We found that the 22S-butyl-20-epi-25,26,27-trinorvitamin D derivative 5 was a potent VDR agonist, whereas the corresponding compound 4 with the natural configuration at C(20) was a potent VDR antagonist. Analogues with the full vitamin D(3) side chain were less potent agonist, and whether they were agonists or antagonists depended on the 24-configuration. X-ray crystal structures demonstrated that the VDR-LBD accommodating the potent agonist 5 has an architecture wherein the lower side and the helix 11 side of the LBP is simply expanded relative to the canonical active-VDR situation; in contrast, the potent antagonist 4 induces an extra cavity to accommodate the branched moiety. This is the first report of a VDR antagonist that generates a new cavity to alter the canonical pocket structure of the ligand occupied VDR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Inaba et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: