Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The goal of a colour management system (CMS) is to keep colour across different display devices. For example, a CMS may be developed to preserve colour from monitor to print. Printed colours on paper can look different from colours displayed on a monitor. Soft proofing is to preview a printed colour image on a monitor. The International Colour Consortium (ICC)/ColourSync media profile based on scanner and colorimetric devices are widely used to match between printed and displayed colours. This soft-proofing feature is effective only when accurate ICC profiles of monitor and printer are available with proper lighting condition. In this study, the authors present an on-site monitor-print colour-matching technique for soft proofing that uses a colour-measuring camera when appropriate device and illumination characteristics are not readily accessible. The proposed method consists of two matching steps: one is the estimation of lighting conditions and paper reflectance and the other is the estimation of printer and monitor characteristics. Lighting conditions and paper reflectance are measured by a camera using a white reference patch. Printer and monitor properties can be estimated using a number of colour samples in separate colour components (intensity and chromaticity). A three-dimensional look-up table method is used for intensity mapping, whereas chromatic adaptation is performed by a 2×5 transformation matrix and gamut mapping. Experimental results with several test images demonstrate that the proposed method shows better colour-matching performance, in terms of perceptual quality, than the soft proofing implemented in Photoshop.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: