Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide The U.S. Naval Academy matriculates ∼1,100 new undergraduate students each year, all of whom are required to complete two semesters of introductory chemistry, regardless of major selection. Thus, each of the ∼50 sections of introductory chemistry comprises students with a broad range of interests, prior chemistry experience, and analytical skills. A survey of 28 chemistry instructors that taught introductory and upper-level courses remotely in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic showed that most met with their students during every scheduled class period and delivered new content synchronously, though methods of instruction varied widely within those parameters. Student engagement decreased in the remote environment, but a small number of instructors reported improvements when a web-based classroom response system was implemented. Extra instruction was requested by fewer students, was generally conducted in group sessions, and was more time-consuming for the faculty. Most faculty teaching introductory chemistry used more multiple-choice assessments than they would in a live setting, because of compatibility with online testing platforms, and most faculty reported little evidence of academic dishonesty during online teaching, in spite of negative preconceptions. The dominant faculty perception is that student performance did not decline after the switch to online learning. Collaborative, supportive, and frequent communication among faculty and staff in the chemistry department was instrumental in facilitating the transition to online teaching.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
O’Carroll et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: