Why the study?
Does the Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) reduce hospitalizations and readmissions compared to standard waiver programs in dually eligible older adults?
Does the Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) reduce hospitalizations and readmissions compared to standard waiver programs in dually eligible older adults?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Enrollment in the PACE program is associated with lower rates of overall hospitalizations, 30-day readmissions, and potentially avoidable hospitalizations compared to similar dually eligible populations.
OBJECTIVES: To measure the rates of hospitalization, readmission, and potentially avoidable hospitalization (PAH) in the Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE). DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING PACE PARTICIPANTS: PACE enrollees. MEASUREMENTS: Hospitalization and PAH rates were measured per 1,000 person-years. Readmission was defined as any return to the hospital within 30 days of prior hospital discharge. PAHs were defined as hospitalizations for conditions that previously established criteria have identified as possibly preventable or manageable without hospitalization. RESULTS: Rate of hospitalization was 539/1,000, vs 962/1,000 for dually eligible aged or disabled waiver (ADW) enrollees. Thirty-day readmission was 19.3%, compared with 22.9% for the national population of dually eligible older enrollees. PAH rate was 100/1,000, compared with 250/1,000 for dually eligible ADW enrollees. Considerable variation was observed between sites. CONCLUSION: PACE enrollees experienced lower rates of hospitalization, readmission, and PAH than similar populations. Variations in hospitalization rates between PACE sites suggest opportunities for quality improvement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Segelman et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: