Why the study?
Physical activity programs in patients with cardiovascular disease require evidence of cost-utility, including their impact on health-related quality of life and healthcare consumption.
Does a progressively autonomous physical activity program improve quality of life and reduce health care consumption compared to a standard supervised physical activity program in patients with coronary artery disease or moderate heart failure?
Does a progressively autonomous physical activity program improve quality of life and reduce health care consumption compared to a standard supervised physical activity program in patients with coronary artery disease or moderate heart failure?
A progressively autonomous physical activity program is cost-effective and improves long-term quality of life while reducing healthcare costs in patients with coronary artery disease or heart failure.
PAP may support cost-effectiveness of PAP for QoL and lower consumption in CVD; leaves open need for larger trials before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Physical activity programs (PAP) in patients with cardiovascular disease require evidence of cost-utility. To assess improvement in health-related quality of life (QoL) and reduction of health care consumption of patients following PAP, a randomized trial was used. METHODS: Patients from a health insurance company who had experienced coronary artery disease or moderate heart failure were invited to participate (N = 1891). Positive responders (N = 50) were randomly assigned to a progressively autonomous physical activity (PAPA) program or to a standard supervised physical activity (SPA) program. The SPA group had two supervised sessions per week over 5 months. PAPA group had one session per week and support to aid habit formation (written tips, exercise program, phone call). To measure health-related quality of life EQ-5D utility score were used, before intervention, 6 months (T6) and 1 year later. Health care costs were provided from reimbursement databases. RESULTS: Mobility, usual activities and discomfort improved significantly in both group (T6). One year later, EQ-5D utility score was improved in the PAPA group only. Total health care consumption in the intervention group decreased, from a mean of 4097 euros per year before intervention to 2877 euros per year after (p = 0.05), compared to a health care consumption of 4087 euros and 4180 euros per year, in the total population of patients (N = 1891) from the health insurance company. The incremental cost effectiveness ratio was 10,928 euros per QALYs. CONCLUSION: A physical activity program is cost-effective in providing a better quality of life and reducing health care consumption in cardiovascular patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN77313697 , retrospectively registered on 20 November 2015.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bailly et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: